Implementation Readiness Assessment Tool

This tool has been designed to assess organisational readiness and capacity for implementing and evaluating new healthcare initiatives. It considers various contextual and individual factors to facilitate successful implementation and evaluation of innovative models of care.

Key Features
  • Applies implementation science frameworks adapted from primary research and existing evidence to inform a holistic assessment of implementation and evaluation readiness.
  • Teams can assess implementation and evaluation capacity across six domains, gaining a broad understanding of readiness for implementation of proposed new innovations.
  • Helps teams recognise strengths and areas for improvement thereby enhancing the likelihood of successful implementation and evaluation.
  • After completing the readiness assessment, teams can create a detailed implementation action plan.

Assessment Details

Assessment Details
  • 30 questions, taking approximately 15 minutes to complete.

  • Rate your innovation or model of care across six key domains, using a scale of 1 to 5.

  • Suitable for individuals or teams in various healthcare settings settings.

Applications of the Tool

Applications of the Tool

This tool is versatile and applicable at any stage to support users in the implementation process, including:

  • To plan by informing the strategic planning process.

  • To design models of care for implementation.

  • To compare multiple models of care.

  • To prepare and assess the readiness of a model of care for implementation.

  • To grow and build capacity for implementation and evaluation.

  • To fund by structuring funding decisions.

  • To evaluate by informing the reasons behind the success or failure of new models of care.

  • To scale or not, determining the trajectory of future of models of care (e.g., adopt, adapt, abandon, scale, and spread).

 

This tool can therefore facilitate ongoing improvement in healthcare implementation and evaluation and enables teams to make data-driven decisions throughout the project lifecycle.

Implementation Action Plan

After completing an organisational implementation readiness assessment, the next step is to develop a detailed action plan. This plan should address any gaps identified and leverage strengths for successful implementation. Key components include:

Goal or Objective: Define a clear, specific goal aligned with assessment findings.

Tasks or Actions: Break down the goal into specific, actionable tasks.

Timeline: Develop a realistic timeline for each task and the overall goal.

Desired Outcomes: Establish Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to measure progress and success

Responsibility: Assign each task to a specific person or team.

To plan Resources: Identify necessary resources, including personnel, materials, and equipment, informing the strategic planning process

Desired Outcomes: Establish KPIs to measure progress and success.

This approach ensures the action plan is tailored to the organisation’s current readiness, facilitating effective implementation.

Clinical solutions

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, detracto efficiantur per in, id decore ponderum legendos sed. Eu qui porro voluptua instructior, labor oporteat partiendo eu duo. Ignota impedit officiis et duo. Ex mei mundi eleifend, nisl justo intelleg quodsi. Est mucius audiam an. Ad sed erat pertinax vituperatoribus. Te vim quo postea possit reprimique, has ex fierent abhorreant scripserit purto euripidis tempor quodsi lorem.

Chemistry testing

Electrical signals

Biological evaluation

Toxicological assessment

Why we believe in open innovation

*Electrical signals in the brain

Why we believe in open innovation

*Electrical signals in the brain

Why we believe in open innovation

*Electrical signals in the brain

Why we believe in open innovation

*Electrical signals in the brain

Why we believe in open innovation

*Electrical signals in the brain

Readiness Assessment

Get Started!

To save your assessments and track progress, Register for an account or Log in to your existing account. To access your completed assessments plans visit My projects.
0%

Implementation Evaluation Hub

Implementation & Evaluation HUB-logo-1

Readiness Assessment Tool

 

THE READINESS ASSESSMENT TOOL IS DIVIDED INTO THREE SECTIONS:

 

Part A: Background Information

The teams must provide details about the new care model, its objectives, the target population, and the implementation location.

 

Part B: Factors Influencing Implementation

Project Teams are required to rate the new model of care across a range of context specific and individual factors that influence implementation across six domains.

The six domains are:

1. Innovation characteristics
2. Outer setting
3. Inner setting
4. Individuals
5. Implementation process
6. Outcomes

 

Part C:

Results

Please fill in the following

1 / 30

Innovation Characteristics

There is evidence (literature, benchmarking) supporting the new model of care.

Also consider NHMRC evidence levels

2 / 30

The model of care has been developed then supported or endorsed by Executive.

3 / 30

Other solutions have been considered and this model of care offers advantages over alternatives.
Consider factors like accessibility, effectiveness, safety, cost, and benefits to stakeholders.

4 / 30

Uncertainties about the model’s benefits have been addressed.
Consider factors like accessibility, effectiveness, safety, cost, and stakeholder benefits.

5 / 30

External Factors

 

The political environment and current strategy or policy priorities align with implementation of the new model of care.

6 / 30

There are defined partnerships and networks to facilitate referral pathways, collaborative care, and continuity of care.
Consider interdisciplinary partnerships, hospital, community, and primary healthcare networks

7 / 30

Implementation of the new model of care meets all the appropriate quality standards and regulatory requirements.

Consider aspects like scope of practice, credentialling and training

8 / 30

Professional organisations and consumer groups support the model of care.

9 / 30

Funding from external entities (e.g., grants, reimbursement) is available to implement and/or deliver the model of care.

10 / 30

Internal Factors

The model of care is aligned with the organisation’s strategic goals and objectives.

11 / 30

There are defined tasks and responsibilities between individuals and teams.

12 / 30

There are adequate resources (funding, staff, space, equipment, technology infrastructure) to safely implement the model of care.

13 / 30

There is training, credentialling and clinical governance pathways for clinicians to implement the model of care.

14 / 30

There are high-quality relationships, communication networks, and professional connections to support implementation of the care model.

15 / 30

The working environment promotes collaboration, cohesion, with a shared sense of purpose to achieve common goals.

Key Stakeholder Groups
High-Level Leaders: Individuals in the executive or senior management level who provide overarching vision, direction, and support for implementation efforts. Mid-Level Leaders: Managers and supervisors who oversee specific departments or units and play a pivotal role in translating organisational goals into actionable plans. Opinion Leaders: Influential individuals within the organisation whose opinions and actions sway the attitudes and behaviours of others, often serving as champions for innovation adoption. Implementation Facilitators: Subject matter experts or consultants who provide guidance, support, and resources to facilitate the implementation process. Implementation Leads and Deliverers: Individuals responsible for leading and executing specific aspects of the implementation plan, driving day-to-day activities and progress. Implementation Support/Team Members: Team members who contribute to the implementation process by providing additional support, expertise, and assistance in various capacities. e.g., data collection, clinic set up training, troubleshooting. Innovation Recipients: End users or beneficiaries of the innovation, including patients, clients, or other stakeholders who experience the direct impact of the new practices or interventions.

16 / 30

People

Consider these questions with each stakeholder group in mind.

Key stakeholders have been identified and their roles defined. (Click the hint icon to see Key stakeholders )

17 / 30

The stakeholders are interested, engaged, and see the benefits of the new model of care.

18 / 30

Stakeholders have the knowledge and skills to fulfill their roles.

19 / 30

Stakeholders have the availability and authority to fulfill their roles.

20 / 30

The stakeholders are motivated and committed to implementing the model of care.

21 / 30

Implementation process

 

In planning the team assessed needs, local context, tailored the approach, defined objectives, and identified necessary processes for the new model of care.

22 / 30

There are plans to test and optimise the new model of care.

23 / 30

There are plans for action based on reflection and evaluation. (e.g., adapt, adopt, abandon, scale and spread)

24 / 30

There is documentation e.g., implementation plan to guide the implementation process.

25 / 30

Outcomes and performance

 

The key objectives and deliverables of the new care model have been defined.

26 / 30

There is a timeframe for planning, implementation, and evaluation of the new model of care.

27 / 30

Outcome measures for the new model of care have been defined.
Consider both implementation and innovation outcomes

28 / 30

The types and sources of information (data) for each outcome measure have been identified. e.g., health records, PREM/PROMS, surveys)

29 / 30

A budget or resources have been allocated for performance evaluation.

30 / 30

There is documentation, e.g., evaluation plan, to guide the evaluation process.

0%



    Implementation & Evaluation HUB-logo-1

    Implementation Readiness Assessment Tool

     

    THE READINESS ASSESSMENT TOOL IS DIVIDED INTO THREE SECTIONS:

     

    Part A: Background Information

    Your team provides details about the new model of care, its objectives, the target population, and the implementation location.

     

    Part B: Factors Influencing Implementation

    Your team rates the new model of care across a range of context specific and individual factors that influence implementation across six domains.

    The six domains are:

    1. Innovation characteristics
    2. Outer setting
    3. Inner setting
    4. Individuals
    5. Implementation process
    6. Outcomes

     

    Part C:

    Results


    The Hub gives you a summary of your results, including your overall readiness for implementation.

    Log in before starting your assessment to save your work under “My Projects” and download PDF reports.

    Please register / login first.

    Part A: Background Information

    INNOVATION CHARACTERISTICS

    Assessment of Implementation Support Factors

    The blue area on the spider graph represents your overall implementation readiness-larger shaded area indicates more factors are in place
    to support successful implementation. Scores closer to five (5) in each domain indicate stronger readiness in that specific area.


    There is evidence (literature, benchmarking) supporting the new model of care.
    Also consider NHMRC evidence levels


    No evidence
    Extensive evidence

    No Evidence


    The model of care been endorsed by the Executive team or relevant authorities?


    No support/endorsement
    Full support/endorsement

    No Evidence


    Other solutions have been considered and this model of care offers advantages over alternatives. Consider factors like accessibility, effectiveness, safety, cost, and benefits to stakeholders.


    Strongly disagree
    Strongly agree
    No Evidence


    Uncertainties about the model’s benefits have been addressed. Consider factors like accessibility, effectiveness, safety, cost, and stakeholder benefits.


    Strongly disagree
    Strongly agree
    No Evidence


    EXTERNAL FACTORS


    Assessment of Implementation Support Factors

    The blue area on the spider graph represents your overall implementation readiness-larger shaded area indicates more factors are in place
    to support successful implementation. Scores closer to five (5) in each domain indicate stronger readiness in that specific area.

    The political environment and current strategy or policy priorities align with implementation of the new model of care.


    Strongly disagree
    Strongly agree

    No Evidence


    There are defined partnerships and networks to facilitate referral pathways, collaborative care, and continuity of care.
    Consider interdisciplinary partnerships, hospital, community, and primary healthcare networks


    Strongly disagree
    Strongly agree

    No Evidence


    Implementation of the new model of care meets all the appropriate quality standards and regulatory requirements.
    Consider aspects like scope of practice, credentialling and training


    Strongly disagree
    Strongly agree

    No Evidence


    Professional organisations and consumer groups support the model of care.


    Strongly disagree
    Strongly agree

    No Evidence


    Funding from external entities (e.g., grants, reimbursement) is available to implement and/or deliver the model of care.


    No funding
    Full funding

    No Evidence


    INTERNAL FACTORS


    Assessment of Implementation Support Factors

    The blue area on the spider graph represents your overall implementation readiness-larger shaded area indicates more factors are in place
    to support successful implementation. Scores closer to five (5) in each domain indicate stronger readiness in that specific area.

    The model of care is aligned with the organisation’s strategic goals and objectives.



    Strongly disagree
    Strongly agree
    No Evidence


    There are defined tasks and responsibilities between individuals and teams.


    Strongly disagree
    Strongly agree
    No Evidence


    There are adequate resources (funding, staff, space, equipment, technology infrastructure) to safely implement the model of care.


    Strongly disagree
    Strongly agree
    No Evidence


    There is training, credentialling and clinical governance pathways for clinicians to implement the model of care.


    Strongly disagree
    Strongly agree
    No Evidence


    There are high-quality relationships, communication networks, and professional connections to support implementation of the care model.


    Strongly disagree
    Strongly agree
    No Evidence


    The working environment promotes collaboration, cohesion, with a shared sense of purpose to achieve common goals.


    Strongly disagree
    Strongly agree
    No Evidence


    PEOPLE


    Assessment of Implementation Support Factors

    The blue area on the spider graph represents your overall implementation readiness-larger shaded area indicates more factors are in place
    to support successful implementation. Scores closer to five (5) in each domain indicate stronger readiness in that specific area.

    Click the hint icon (+) to see Key stakeholder groups
    Key stakeholders have been identified and their roles defined. (Click the hint icon to see Key stakeholders )


    None
    All

    No Evidence


    The stakeholders are interested, engaged, and see the benefits of the new model of care.


    None
    All

    No Evidence


    Stakeholders have the knowledge and skills to fulfill their roles.


    None
    All

    No Evidence


    Stakeholders have the availability and authority to fulfill their roles.


    None
    All

    No Evidence


    The stakeholders are motivated and committed to implementing the model of care.


    None
    All

    No Evidence


    IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS

    Assessment of Implementation Support Factors

    The blue area on the spider graph represents your overall implementation readiness-larger shaded area indicates more factors are in place
    to support successful implementation. Scores closer to five (5) in each domain indicate stronger readiness in that specific area.

    In planning the team assessed needs, local context, tailored the approach, defined objectives, and identified necessary processes for the new model of care.


    Strongly disagree
    Strongly agree
    No Evidence


    There are plans to test and optimise the new model of care.


    Strongly disagree
    Strongly agree
    No Evidence


    There are plans for action based on reflection and evaluation. (e.g., adapt, adopt, abandon, scale and spread)


    Strongly disagree
    Strongly agree
    No Evidence


    There is documentation e.g., implementation plan to guide the implementation process.


    Strongly disagree
    Strongly agree
    No Evidence


    OUTCOMES AND PERFORMANCE


    Assessment of Implementation Support Factors

    The blue area on the spider graph represents your overall implementation readiness-larger shaded area indicates more factors are in place
    to support successful implementation. Scores closer to five (5) in each domain indicate stronger readiness in that specific area.

    The key objectives and deliverables of the new care model have been defined.


    Strongly disagree
    Strongly agree
    No Evidence


    There is a timeframe for planning, implementation, and evaluation of the new model of care.


    Strongly disagree
    Strongly agree
    No Evidence


    Outcome measures for the new model of care have been defined.
    Consider both implementation and innovation outcomes


    Strongly disagree
    Strongly agree
    No Evidence


    The types and sources of information (data) for each outcome measure have been identified. e.g., health records, PREM/PROMS, surveys


    Strongly disagree
    Strongly agree
    No Evidence


    A budget or resources have been allocated for performance evaluation.


    Strongly disagree
    Strongly agree
    No Evidence


    There is documentation, e.g., evaluation plan, to guide the evaluation process.


    Strongly disagree
    Strongly agree
    No Evidence


    YOUR RESULTS

    Domains Innovation Characteristics External factors Internal factors People Implementation process Outcomes and performance
    Total Domain Score
    Percentage Domain Score
    Implementation readiness

    Overall readiness for implementation
     
    Interpretation  
    Score 1.00-2.99 The model of care is not ready for implementation.
    Score 3.00-3.99 The model of care is promising but requires further information or planning.
    Score 4.00-5.00 The model of care is ready for implementation or requires only minor modifications.


    Assessment of Implementation Support Factors

    The blue area on the spider graph represents your overall implementation readiness-larger shaded area indicates more factors are in place
    to support successful implementation. Scores closer to five (5) in each domain indicate stronger readiness in that specific area.

    INNOVATION CHARACTERISTICS

    EXTERNAL FACTORS

    EXTERNAL FACTORS

    PEOPLE

    Implementation

    Outcpome